Monday, February 28, 2005

Metric: 43% of all US SMS messages are spam

[via Fierce Wireless]
According to findings from Wireless Services Coporation, 43 percent of all mobile text messages in the US are now spam. That's almost double from 2003, when only 18 percent of text messages in the US were spam. In December alone SMS spam accounted for roughly 1.2 billion messages blocked by Wireless Services. The growth of mobile spam is being caused by spammers who are now branching out beyond traditional email to the wireless market, where they are specifically targeting mobile addresses.

Tuesday, February 22, 2005

mobile traffic app

http://www.russellbeattie.com/notebook/1008318.html

more java stats

Java is continuing to grow, and accelerate - on both the devices (and SIM cards embedded within them), and in the network infrastructure. There are now over 500,000,000 Java enabled phones in the world, and more than 60% of all new phones will ship, from the factory, Java enabled. The rush of new developers we're adding to the nearly 5 million Java developers are J2ME developers, folks creating the services (from commercial to social) through which the majority of the world will experience the internet.
And just in case you missed it, let me say it again: the majority of the world will first experience the internet through their mobile phones. We sometimes forget that 10 times as many people bought handsets last year as PC's. Round numbers, there were a BILLION wireless devices sold last year, and around 100 million PC's. To that end, the odds are much higher you'll watch broadcast broadband content on your phone than on your PC - and now that Nokia (and their peers) are the world's largest camera manufacturers (just think about that for a moment), the odds are far higher you'll even create broadband content on your handset. Talk about change. Comdex is dead, long live 3GSM.

Looks Count for Cell Phones ..the status symbol !!!

http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,66655,00.html

In my opinion same would hold for anything cool looking om ur phone..such as dynamic idle screen or any application that does unch of stuff which others can't :) after all reality is just an illusion ;)

a cool way to access aggregated news

check out tenbyten.org

Thursday, February 17, 2005

There you go.. The future of RSS

[via Emergic.org]

Richard MacManus writes: "In the not too distant future, more people will subscribe to topic/tag/remix feeds than feeds of actual people."

He adds in a follow-up post:
The killer app for RSS probably won't be geared towards the current ranks of bloggers and geeks. When RSS hits it big, it'll be because 'normal' people start using it - your Mom and Dad, Frank from Marketing, Jessie from Payroll, Dave from the local dairy. They won't be bloggers. They won't be interested in writing or podcasting or anything like that. All they'll want to do is track news and trends that are relevant to them.
Tools will evolve to let people easily set-up personalized searches for information relevant to them and subscribe to the results - using, you guessed it, RSS! Google will probably be the front-runner, PubSub will be another, current players like Bloglines and Technorati will be in amongst it, and who knows who else.
In the future RSS will still be a community enabler, but by far its biggest use will be as a means to subscribe to personalised news and other information important to the lives of non-blogging people. Examples of the information I'm talking about: stocks, bank statements, weather, information needed for one's job, sports news, niche information (the long tail), lots of other things we can't predict yet ;-)

Tuesday, February 15, 2005

Some stats

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/afp/20050215/tc_afp/afplifestylefrance

Nokia is not being left behind, with its first-ever video-oriented 3G smartphone, the 6680. This year will see Nokia launch 10 new 3G phones that will retail from around 100 euros, Nokia's Tuutti told AFP.
Finland's Nokia said Tuesday that it expects to see a total of two billion mobile phone users globally by the end of 2005 and estimates the number will reach three billion by the end of 2010.
"There is tremendous growth in 3G," Nokia's Tuuti emphasised. Nokia estimates the number of 3G users will hit the 70 million mark by the end of 2005 compared with 16 million at the end of last year.
So-called smartphones, which enable callers to see each other while talking as well as handling entertainment downloads and instant e-mail access, are now the fastest growing segment, Tuuti said.

Nokia expects this market to grew to over 50 million units this year compared with 22 million in 2004 and hopes to scoop up 40 percent of all sales.

[via Emergic.org]

Rich Skrenta writes about the difference between the Reference Web and the Incremental Web:
Google searches the reference Internet. Users come to google with a specific query, and search a vast corpus of largely static information. This is a very valuable and lucrative service to provide: it's the Yellow Pages.

Blogs may look like regular HTML pages, but the key difference is that they're organized chronologically. New posts appear at the top, so with a single browser reload you can say "Just show me what's new."
This seems like a trivial difference, but it drives an entirely different delivery, advertising and value chain. Rather than using HTML, the delivery protocol for web pages, there is a desire for a new, feed-centric protocol: RSS. To search chronologically-ordered content, a relevance-based search that destroys the chronology such as Google is inappropriate. Instead you want Feedster, PubSub or Technorati. Feed content may be better to read in a different sort of client, such as Newsgator, rather than a web browser.
And finally, there is a different advertising opportunity. Rather than the sort of business ads you see in the Yellow Pages, instead the ad opportunity is more about reaching a particular demographic or subscriber group. The kind of ads that are in magazines. How do you keyword target a breakfast cereal advertisement to fitness-conscious 21-25 year olds? You can't. You need to find something those people are reading, and put your ad there.
There are 4-8 million active blogs now. At this size, you can still "know" the top bloggers, and find new posts worth reading by clicking around. But when the blogosphere grows 100X or 1000X, the current discovery model will break down. You'll need algorithmic techniques like Topix.net or a Findory to channel the most relevant material from the constant flood of new content.Rich is on the right track, but there are a few additional points which need thinking:
Rajesh Jain adds:
- We need to think beyond just text to multimedia for mass-market content creation and management. [Think Flickr.]
- In emerging markets like India, the mobile and not the computer will be at the heart of the Incremental Web.
- The interface has to go beyond the search box to more natural navigational interfaces. [Think Speech.]
- The published content is being amplified/tagged by the mass market -- thsi also needs to be taken into account. [Think Del.icio.us.]
- A user's "subscriptions" will be the filter through which the user will want to see the Incremental Web. [Think RSS+OPML.]

Monday, February 14, 2005

How to make consumers addicted to your service..an example of multiplayer gaming

[via Emergic.org]

There are many reasons why MMOGs make enviable businesses:
1. Recurring Revenues. Anyone who has ever sold software covets thepredictability of recurring revenues, particularly subscription revenuesthat are basically "good until cancel." Most of the leading MMOG businessesemploy some form of subscription pricing.
2. Competitive Moats. Warren Buffet is fond of saying he likes businesseswith castle-like moats (i.e., ones with high barriers to entry). As usersinvest more and more time into a persistent character, into an avatar, intoaccomplishments, into online relationships, and into the resultingreputation, the higher the costs to switch to an alternate platform.
3. Network Effects / Increasing Returns. There is no better online barrierto entry than a strong community. Witness how Amazon and Yahoo both failedto distract eBay users even when offering a free product. For most MMOGs,the more users a particular game has, the more compelling the experience isfor incremental users. This self-reinforcing form of Metcalfe's Law isalive and well in many MMOGs.
4. Real Competition. In the future, traditional software-based games willmerely be practice vehicles for the much more interesting endeavor ofmultiplayer competition. MMOGs allow for a sense of competitiveaccomplishment and provide vehicles for the human ego to be rewarded, all ofwhich drives extremely obsessive behavior.
5. Time Engaged. According to the previously mentioned Forbes article, "agood PC-based game has a lifespan of 30 hours of play; a good multiplayergame gets 20 hours in just a week." This puts MMOGs, from the perspectiveof today's users, on par with television in terms of time engaged.
6. Unlimited Complexity. In a world where other players are part of theuser experience, the number of permutations of experiences is quiterealistically limitless. From the relatively simple rule-sets and economiespresent in most MMOGs, astonishingly complex emergent behaviors arise. Thisoffers a stark contrast to previous interactive entertainment where the gamecan eventually be "beaten" by the user.
7. High Risk, But High Reward. The number one criticism of MMOGs is thatthey are "hit" businesses like Hollywood businesses. A closer look willreveal that the average successful MMOG has had a useful life of over fiveyears. What's more, sequels are amazingly popular. As such, it is notunrealistic for a title to last ten years. That said, there are many, manyMMOG efforts that fail to reach the break-even number of subscribersnecessary to have a positive return on investment. As with the entirehistory of finance, risk and reward remain correlated.

Friday, February 11, 2005

Blogs..adwords

[from Slashdot]

Doug Nelson writes "Michael Buffington chose to build a weblog using highly automated content aggregation tools around a single keyword, asbestos, because of the high click through rate associated with the ad. 'The subject matter, while weighty and all that, is of little importance to me. It's not that I don't have opinions on asbestos and asbestos reform, because I do. The whole point of the site is to experiment with an idea. I built a tool that helps me aggregate topical news with the help of Google's Alert system. So far it works wonderfully. But there's a second motive as well. Right now asbestos reform and asbestos related litigation is on fire. Lawyers are paying anywhere from $15-100 per click through on Google ads. The second part of this big experiment is to see if I can capture some of that click through revenue while still providing a somewhat valid service to people who might arrive by search results.'"

Relaoding the path to digital freedom..part 1

[via u-blog.net]

It is funny how sometimes History is surprising : coincidence are more present than we think.
One of the disappointment of our time is the time coïncidence of two human revolutions : Cell Phone and the Internet.
Mobile Phone system seemed to be just an iterative process of the century-old usage, the phone : nevertheless they have just been extraordinary successfull BUT have created a legacy Marketing Structure of prominent MOBILE OPERATOR (CELLCO) imported from the phone age.
Internet never aimed to be a massive users system BUT has finally revealed as the most robust, scalable and innovation fueled network stucture than humans have ever created.
The paradox is that the two revolution are strictly OPPOSITE in structure :
One is anarchic and decentralized vs. the other is centrally controlled and consistenly planned.
One is "End Point Centered" giving autonomy to the machines controlled by end-users vs. the other is "Network Centered" servicing people needs by carefully designed locking contracts.
These oppositions explain why all the primary attempts to merge the two environments failed : they took the most limitative path to go.
Internet world has overprovisionned the Server Part and recreate a telco model ("à la Mainframe") with giants such as Google or IBM : one of the most reason of that is the scarcity model of endpoint identifiers aka global IP adress that breaks the E2E Principle.
The cellcos has deliberately limited the capacity and functional autonomy of mobile and keep on marketing around the PHONE CONCEPT that is too much inconsciently embedded in people's mind as a "dumb" phoning system. They have also distorted the Internet by leveraging Walled Garden models, artificially made to keep people dependant of the French Minitel Model.
However, mobile phones has spread extraordinarly : they have destroyed the Space time limit of people communications. AND they have embedded in people's mind the CRUCIAL BREAKTHROUGH of a "Silicon Stuff" that follow people EVERYWHERE EVERYTIME, a point that Walkman never succeeded to do.

Changing Collaboration Tools

[via Emergic.org]

Network World writes:
Ozzie says a changing world of online communication and collaboration, fueled by real-time tools such as instant messaging and wikis, could drive the evolution of online collaboration in any number of directions and users will have to consider if collaboration is best controlled by those at the edge of the network as opposed to centralized IT.
Ozzie said that for his kids, e-mail is dead. "They use IM. It is their e-mail. They only get e-mail from people they don't want to talk to."
He says the kids' actions show that users will assemble tools in terms of what works for them and what does not. "When [my kids] want to talk long distance they download Skype (a VoIP client). They experiment with blogs and wikis."
The point, he said, is that online collaboration happens at the edge of the network and not within centralized IT.

Wednesday, February 09, 2005

MasterCard Uses Cell Phones to Fight Fraud

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/pcworld/20050209/tc_pcworld/119621


Tuesday, February 08, 2005

RSS ..Really Something Special ..

[via VentureBlog]

RSS - Really Something Special?
By Kevin Laws on Internet Infrastructure

Is RSS for real, or is it today's Social Networking?
It is hard to travel Silicon Valley these days without hearing the term RSS. People who don't even know what the term means want to invest in it, create companies around it, or add it to their products. (VentureBlog's David Hornik correctly predicted the rise of RSS over a year ago). AskJeeves just purchased Bloglines this week, spurring more interest in the space.


Complete article at: http://www.ventureblog.com/articles/indiv/2005/001187.html

Verisign's plan

[via Emergic.org]

Forbes writes:
[Verisign CEO] Sclavos is betting much of VeriSign's future on the growth in wireless. As wireless service providers rush to add services to their networks, and as people increasingly use cell phones and other wireless devices to communicate and transact business, VeriSign intends to provide the software that will make it all secure.
VeriSign's aim has always been to provide the infrastructure services needed so that companies can communicate and handle electronic commerce over the Internet as well as voice networks. But in the 1990s, its focus was to enable secure interactions between Web sites and consumers, secure e-mail and secure extranets.
Now, Sclavos' strategy is to bridge these voice and data services that enable business transactions--a move that will likely benefit the company's Telecom Infrastructure Group, which handles wireless and wireline signaling, database services as well as clearing and billing.

Blog..most popular word of 2004

It's OfficialBlog was the most popular word of 2004, based on online lookups at the site of dictionary publisher Merriam-Webster; it's being added to the 2005 edition of the dictionary. Web-based journals were in the spotlight during the presidential election.

Source: http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/zd/20050205/tc_zd/144867

some stats on symbian

Symbian is the world's biggest producer of software for so-called smartphones, a new category of versatile phones that can have built-in music players and video recorders, and which run computer-like applications such as enterprise customer relationship software, car navigation programs and e-mail.
Today its software is the engine of some 20 million phones, available through 200 mobile operators around the world.

Market research group IDC forecasts 130 million smartphones will be sold in 2008 alone. Symbian receives between $5 and $7.25 for every phone that contains its software, depending on sales volumes.

'Podcasting' Lets Masses Do Radio Shows

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/ap/20050207/ap_on_hi_te/podcasting

Chinese portals hit by ban on horoscope advertising..Mobile messaging!!!

Complete Story at: http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/ft/20050208/bs_ft/6dbd152079c311d9ba2a00000e2511c8

Some excerpts...

China's biggest internet portal has warned that revenues and profits will suffer sharp sequential falls this quarter after its business was hit by surprise moves by the state broadcasting administration and the dominant state-owned mobile telecom operator.


Sohu.com this week unveiled results showing revenues actually fell in the fourth quarter of last year compared with the previous three months - and forecast a further decline in sales and profits for January to March 2005. Netease releases its results later this month.
Sina, the biggest of the portal trio, said it was seeking ways to reduce its dependence on mobile phone messaging services after being taken by surprise by recent actions by the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television (Sarft) and operator China Mobile.


Sina is also suffering from moves by China Mobile, the country's biggest wireless telecoms operator, to change its billing process for multi-media message services (MMS). MMS can be much more elaborate than simple texting and are seen as a key source of future growth.
The billing change caused a "significant reduction in revenues" from MMS, Sina said, adding that further planned moves by China Mobile could help cut MMS revenues by half.

What websites do to TURN ON Teens ?

[via Wired.com]


It begins with interactivity, Nielsen said.
"That seems to be the common denominator," said Nielsen, who for the study observed American and Australian teenagers using dozens of websites across a variety of genres. They want to be "doing something as opposed to just sitting and reading, which tends to be more boring and something they say they do enough of already in school."

Nielsen explained that the best interactive elements include message boards, polls, quizzes, the ability to ask questions of experts, and tools that let teens construct their own web pages.
Another element teens find attractive is the use of photographs and images that relieve text of the burden of communicating ideas, but that don't weigh down a page. And while adults don't like cluttered web pages or too much writing either, he added, they are significantly more tolerant of a heavier text-to-images ratio.

Teens are also much less willing than adults to stick around websites with useful content but poor presentation, Nielsen said.

"We saw that a lot in the study," he said. "After one or two pages, (teens) are ready to make their judgment. Adults aren't going to spend two hours, but they have more patience if they feel, 'I need this for my job or for my vacation.'"




ielsen pointed to several sites as examples of what teenagers like.
One was SparkNotes, which offers study guides on subjects from math to chemistry to SAT preparation. He explained that the teens in his study enjoyed the site's combination of useful information, uncluttered appearance and interactivity; its interface also made it easy for teens to find what they needed to complete school assignments.
Another example was Apple Computer's site, due to a clean presentation -- an appropriate amount of images and text presented on a white background -- and the ease with which teens were able to research future purchases.
"One of the things teens do (online) is a variant of e-commerce," Nielsen said. "I say variant because they might want to buy (a) product in a physical channel, but they do the research online. So it's important for companies that sell to teens that they have good descriptions."
Not all the sites teens like are trying to sell them things. Nielsen said sites like CSUMentor and TeensHealth both rated highly among the study's subjects because they smartly mixed information and presentation and didn't ask teens to work too hard.
"It just looks like it's not going to be very hard work to play on this website, and that's what pulls teens in," said Nielsen of CSUMentor. "It's not hard work. They maybe are kind of a little bit on the lazy side."
Other sites the study identified as teen-friendly include:
Community: createblog.com, MySpace.com, TeenChat.comEntertainment: RollingStone.com, CartoonNetwork.comGames: Real.com, GameFAQs.com, PlanetDreamcastContent: Lyrics.com, Ontario Consultants on Religious ToleranceShopping: LaCie.com, Wet SealSports: MLB.com, race-deZert.com
To Susanna Stern, an assistant professor at the University of San Diego who works regularly with teens, one of the most important factors in attracting teens to a website is making them feel respected.
"If you take teens seriously," Stern said, "they'll take you seriously."
Also important, she said, is enabling teens to explore their identity by providing them with an environment in which they can experiment with ideas of style, the way they talk, the way they dress and the way they think about the sensitive issues in their lives -- all anonymously.
But Stern said teens' need to be understood often leads them to worry less about privacy than do adults.
"It often surprises me how much teens are willing to self-disclose," said Stern, and "how much they are seeking ... validation or connection in this online setting."
And that means, she explained, that teens frequently look the other way when commercial sites ask for personal information, responding to the kinds of requests that drive many adults away.
"Young people are willing to overlook corporate intentions, or maybe not be aware of corporate intentions that ask for private information," she said. "My impression is that (it's because) they're so eager to be taken seriously."
The upshot, she said, is that teens appear not to worry that marketers are trying to take advantage of them.
"They're very savvy about advertising," she said, "but my sense is that they just don't care."

24 hours on Craigslist

Wired news has a very interesting post:


For people who have successfully used the online überclassifieds marketplace known as craigslist to buy something, sell something, get a job, find a date or anything else, there is often a sense that they're in on a secret.
In part that's because of craigslist's rudimentary design -- no graphics, and simple text layouts that look like they could have been done by a 12-year-old.


But as Michael Ferris Gibson's new film, 24 Hours on Craigslist -- currently playing at the San Francisco Independent Film Festival -- demonstrates, there are a lot of other people in on the secret as well -- and their secrets may well be a tad more salacious than yours.
Gibson's film chronicles the outcome of more than 80 craigslist postings from a single day: Aug. 4, 2003. Ferris' eight film crews -- all found on craigslist -- followed people's stories from the beginning, in some cases mere minutes after midnight on Aug. 4, until the conclusion, sometimes days later.
Along the way, we're introduced to a bizarre cross section of craigslist users in search of the most mundane things -- think roommates and band members -- to the truly weird. And everywhere in between.
There is no question that craigslist, with more than 1.7 billion pageviews a month and a presence in nearly 100 cities worldwide, has changed the way many millions of people buy and sell things, meet people, and look for jobs and places to live. Yet at its core, it is just a classifieds service, and in many cases no wilder than what you might find in the ads in a New York or San Francisco alternative weekly newspaper.

Complete story at: http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,66530,00.html

www.24hoursoncraigslist.com adds:

In 1995 craigslist.org was born: a free, down-to-earth and uncensored bulletin board that revolutionized the ease and speed with which people could communicate, exchange goods and services, and create community. Primarily focusing on housing, jobs, items for sale and personal ads, the site soon became a hub for San Francisco's wired community.

2003. Craigslist is big. Really big. Over 1/3 of all Bay Area internet users utilize craigslist on a regular basis. Outside of the Bay Area, craigslist has spread to 31 cities across the globe, with no sign of slowing. In San Francisco alone, the site receives over 23,000 posts daily, with page views close to 29 million daily. With no advertising, no commercialization and only word-of-mouth promotion, craigslist has become a phenomenon. And it's still free.

Monday, February 07, 2005

Tagging

Tagging [via Emergic.org]


Martin Tobias writes:
So a lot of people are trying to put a meta layer on top of the web and blogs and other types of data. Technorati with Tags is trying to aggregate blog entries, Flickr photos and del.icio.us entries. Technorati watchlists only search for the keyword you want in blog postings (just like typing in biodiesel on their search box). Del.icio.us serves up web and blog matches in reverse chronological order (and will automatically generate an RSS feed that matches). Del.icio.us only gives you bookmarks that its members have tabbed, they don't do any crawling. Then PubSub gets all the pings and does keyword searching much like Technorati (although the results are different yet again). Google takes web sites and blog entries (no flickr) and applies their page rank to the results.
So, which do I like better? Well it depends on what I am looking for. If I wanted a javascript sidebar that shows me the latest news/posts about biodiesel, I would stick with Technorati or PubSub since they do a better time with the real time posts. If I were looking for a good list of general biodiesel resources, especially the most authoritative SITES, I would use Google or maybe del.isio.us. Would be nice if I could take any or all of these lists and have them auto javascript sidebared for me. That would be a cool service.Dave Pell adds: "The content keeps moving out of the container. And you can search it and soon subscribe to it in different forms that meet your need. Want a personal news feed on everything anyone has to say about San Francisco? Fine. Want that to be limited to people who are describing travels in San Francisco. No problem. The poster is incented to label their content so you can find it. And the community will further label that content because, well, damn, that's just the sort of thing the community does."
Micro Persuasion writes: "Tags are a natural complement to search because they empower users to create structures that organize unstructured consumer-generated media. Last week I wrote about the need for marketers and communicators to monitor folksonomies. However, the online marketing opportunity here is actually much greater. As tagging takes off, the next step will be for all of these sites to monetize this content by launching contextual advertising programs, perhaps powered by Google Adsense. This will give the marketer new ways to reach engaged consumers by sponsoring tags across one or more sites that carry folksonomies. I call this 'Tagtextual Advertising' and it's a coming."
Russel Beattie writes:
It seems to me that tags should be, for the most part, universal. The question is how to do it and keep the usability which has popularized their usage to date?
One thought is this: If I say "bug" am I talking about the creature or the problem in my computer code? One way would be to do "combination" tags so that tags are ambiguous unless combined with other tags ("computer bug", "creature bug") - this is how we communicate as human beings no? I don't stop what I'm saying and give you some sort of universal definition, though admittedly I may point down at the ground or at my computer to give you some sort of context.
The other thought is to have each tag point to a universal definition of itself. I'm not talking about some sort of universal ontology organized in to some massive hierarchy. It's been tried before. I'm talking about just a simple dictionary definition out there to give people context. Think about a WikiPedia for tags that everyone can point to. Let's call it "Tagopedia". Now as I'm writing out my tags, I can include a URL like http://www.tagopedia.com/wiki/bug#computers if it's really important for me to make sure that everyone knows what I'm talking about. If there is no such entry on that page, well, it's a Wiki, so I can just go add it. I guess this could just piggyback on WikiPedia instead of creating yet another repository, but I like the idea of being able to tag something "/wiki/russellbeattie#1" as well. The most important bit is that these URLs aren't just identifiers, but actually resolve somewhere. Like pointing at the thing you're talking about, it gives tags and keywords context.
This it seems would go a long way towards the dream of the semantic web. You don't have to universally identify *everything* like in RDF, you just associate some keywords. Then suddenly it becomes much easier to organize, aggregate and search intelligently. [via David Weinberger] BurningBird adds:
I believe that ultimately interest in folksonomies will go the way of most memes, in that they're fun to play with, but eventually we want something that won't splinter, crack, and stumble the very first day it's released.
...no matter how many tricks you play with something like tags, you can only pull out as much 'meaning' as you put into them.
...the semantic web is going to be built 'by the people', but it won't be built on chaos. In other words, 100 monkeys typing long enough will NOT write Shakespeare; nor will a 100 million people randomly forming associations create the semantic web.Nova Spivack adds: "Imagine a folksonomy combined with an ontology -- a "folktology." In a folktology, users could instantly propose or modify ontological classes and properties in the same manner that they do with tags in tagging systems. The most popular ontological constructs (the most-instantiated classes, or slots on classes, for example) would "rise to the top" and self-amplify, while the less-instantiated ones would "fall to the bottom" over time. In this way an emergent, self-organizing, and self-pruning ontology could emerge within a community. Such a system would have the ease and adaptability of a folksonomy plus the semantic richness and formal structure of an ontology."

What's eduaction. :)

A poor, ill educated man created billion dollar Reliance industry.
Two business graduates from Stanford and Wharton Business School, busy breaking it up.
That's education.


Saturday, February 05, 2005

Wireless Business & Technology

Wireless Business & Technology

US Mobile Data Market to Reach $1.5 billion by 2006

US Mobile Data Market to Reach $1.5 billion by 2006

PRESS RELEASE: 2.4 billion Java handsets in the market by 2009

PRESS RELEASE: 2.4 billion Java handsets in the market by 2009

Friday, February 04, 2005

Nice one...

One day LOVE asked FRIENDSHIP, "why are you in the world when i am here?" Friendship smiled & said "TO SPREAD SMILES WHERE YOU LEAVE TEARS!!!

Thursday, February 03, 2005

The Weblog Question

[via informationweek.com]

People are starting Weblogs in growing numbers, but the owner of the content isn't always clear

Story at: http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=4LIZMGIVEVVQ4QSNDBGCKHSCJUMEKJVN?articleID=59100462


Rand McNally Offers Traffic Info For Mobile Phones

There you go, I remember discussing this a few days back with varun :)

[via yahoo.com]

Map publisher Rand McNally has launched a service that provides real-time traffic information for cellular phone users.

Rand McNally Traffic is a downloadable application that's available for Sprint PCS, Verizon Wireless, AT&T Wireless and AllTel subscribers. Once installed, the software can receive and display traffic information on accidents, congestion and lane and road closures.
The service, which covers 94 metro areas, also provides regional maps and information on public transit, weather conditions and sporting and concert events.

Rand McNally Traffic costs $3.99 a month on Sprint and Verizon, and is available to AT&T Wireless subscribers through its mMode service. Rand McNally Traffic was "coming soon" to AllTel subscribers.

Chinese Internet users expected to reach 134 mln by late 2005

[via yahoo.com]

BEIJING (AFP) - The number of Internet users in China will hit 134 million by the end of 2005, consolidating its position as the second largest market in the world after the United States, a research firm said.

Complete story at: http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/afp/20050203/tc_afp/chinainternet

Wednesday, February 02, 2005

Rojo ..RSS + Social Networking

[via Emergic.org]

Technology Review writes:
San Francisco's Rojo is one of dozens of RSS aggregator companies. Like some of its competitors, Rojo has an RSS feed search function and gives readers the ability to flag stories they find important or interesting. But in enabling users to draw on the insights of friends, family, colleagues, and others in their social networks, Rojo departs from most of the competition. Rojo users can invite others to sign up for Rojo accounts; those accounts are linked, much like the accounts on the popular website Friendster. Rojo users can see what RSS feeds the members of their networks are reading and which stories they are flagging. Network popularity also affects the ranking of results when the user searches RSS feeds. "We all depend on our community for content discovery," says Chris Alden, Rojo's cofounder and CEO. "Any successful media service has to tap into that."
Alden says Rojo is the first company to combine RSS aggregation with social networking, but it probably won't be the last. Rojo is one of a growing number of companies turning social networks into a tool for better managing and sharing online content. Of course, the makers of longer-standing RSS aggregators like Bloglines predictably point out that Rojo is missing a lot of features that their own services provide and charge that Rojo's website isn't easy or intuitive to use.

News.com adds:
Rojo, a San Francisco start-up in the blog aggregation business, "is wrapping a communications capability around content consumption," said Andreessen, Web browser pioneer, Rojo investor and Opsware chairman. "And the killer app for the Internet is and always has been communication."
Like Google's PageRank algorithm and other search engine technologies, Rojo examines the link structure of the so-called blogosphere in order to call attention to blog items and feeds that have proved popular with other readers. Along the same lines, it follows e-commerce sites like Amazon.com in recommending related feeds.
And like social networking sites such as Friendster, Rojo narrows down the community of blog readers to those within a user-defined network of friends and associates.

Pure Entrepreneurs

[via Emergic.org]
Boston Globe has an article by Scott Kirsner:


Pure entrepreneurs are loopy and obsessed. They have a vision of the future, and while others are casting their lines into the water to see what will bite, pure entrepreneurs are jumping over the gunwales and swimming after the white whale.

Pure entrepreneurship, by my definition, is often driven by a belief that a major shift is coming -- and thus it's hard to find customers who already understand that they need the product a pure entrepreneur is developing.

Pure entrepreneurship is often a solo enterprise, funded by credit cards, consulting projects, and second mortgages. It sparks revolutions and spawns big companies.

''Something just clicks, and you say, 'This is worth doing, and I think other people will be interested,' " Dan Bricklin says. ''It hits you that there's a need, and that pursuing it is worth the risk."

Questions for Entrepreneurs

[Via Emergic.org]

Chris Wand's Questions for Entrepreneurs (June)

This is one of those lists which no entrepreneur should do without. Every now and then, it is a good idea to review these questions and answer them for the venture that you are doing. Better still, the entire management team should independently answer these questions and then compare notes.

1) WHAT IS YOUR VISION?
- What is your big vision?
- What problem are you solving and for whom?
- Where do you want to be in the future?

2) WHAT IS YOUR MARKET OPPORTUNITY AND HOW BIG IS IT?
- How big is the market opportunity you are pursuing and how fast is it growing?
- How established (or nascent) is the market?
- Do you have a credible claim on being one of the top two or three players in the market?

3) DESCRIBE YOUR PRODUCT/SERVICE
- What is your product/service?
- How does it solve your customer's problem?
- What is unique about your product/service?

4) WHO IS YOUR CUSTOMER?
- Who are your existing customers?
- Who is your target customer?
- What defines an "ideal" customer prospect?
- Who actually writes you the check?
- Use specific customer examples where possible.

5) WHAT IS YOUR VALUE PROPOSITION?
- What is your value proposition to the customer?
- What kind of ROI can your customer expect by using buying your product/service?
- What pain are you eliminating?
- Are you selling vitamins, aspirin or antibiotics? (I.e. a luxury, a nice-to-have, or a need-to-have)

6) HOW ARE YOU SELLING?
- What does the sales process look like and how long is the sales cycle?
- How will you reach the target customer? What does it cost to "acquire" a customer?
- What is your sales, marketing and distribution strategy?
- What is the current sales pipeline?

7) HOW DO YOU ACQUIRE CUSTOMERS?
- What is your cost to acquire a customer?
- How will this acquisition cost change over time and why?
- What is the lifetime value of a customer?

8) WHO IS YOUR MANAGEMENT TEAM?
- Who is the management team?
- What is their experience?
- What pieces are missing and what is the plan for filling them?

9) WHAT IS YOUR REVENUE MODEL?
- How do you make money?
- What is your revenue model?
- What is required to become profitable?

10) WHAT STAGE OF DEVELOPMENT ARE YOU AT?
- What is your stage of development? Technology/product? Team? Financial metrics/revenue?
- What has been the progress to date (make reality and future clear)?
- What are your future milestones?

11) WHAT ARE YOUR PLANS FOR FUND RAISING?
- What funds have already been raised?
- How much money are you raising and at what valuation?
- How will the money be spent?
- How long will it last and where will the company "be" on its milestones progress at that time?
- How much additional funding do you anticipate raising & when?

12) WHO IS YOUR COMPETITION?
- Who is your existing & likely competition?
- Who is adjacent to you (in the market) that could enter your market (and compete) or could be a co-opted partner?
- What are their strengths/weaknesses?
- Why are you different?

13) WHAT PARTNERSHIPS DO YOU HAVE?
- Who are your key distribution and technology partners (current & future)?
- How dependent are you on these partners?

14) HOW DO YOU FIT WITH THE PROSPECTIVE INVESTOR?
- How does this fit w/ the investor's portfolio and expertise?
- What synergies, competition exist with the investor's existing portfolio?

15) OTHER
- What assumptions are key to the success of the business?
- What "gotchas" could change the business overnight? New technologies, new market entrants, change in standards or regulations?
- What are your company's weak links?

[via Emergic.org]

Apple's iPod Platform

Steve Gillmor writes that Apple is organising around the iPod:


1. The iPod Shuffle

Though most of us boomers can't fathom the idea that "life is random" is a feature, the Shuffle's secret sauce is its Playlist mode, turned off by default. Attention: iPodder developers-if you develop SmartPlaylist functionality in your aggregators, you can use attention and other explicit metadata to program iTunes to download, sort, and sequence podcasts while you sleep. Remember, the iPod is the delivery system, the data cache at the end of the pipeline. Of course, if some smart 3rd-party vendor adds a microphone that clips onto the Shuffle, it's a data recorder hanging around your neck.

2. The Mini

For podcasters, this is a $500 studio-in-a-box. GarageBand now supports multitrack recording (eight channels each with their own eq and effects) and the ability to create your own loops. Combine GarageBand with Smart Playlists and slice and dice your podcasts up into "songs" that you can sequence and, more importantly, pull "quotes" for inclusion in other podcasts. Once again, remember that the iPod is the endpoint of the production environment. The Mini is the studio, the mastering lab, where you cut the virtual grooves between the tracks of these next-generation podcasts.

3. "Tiger"

The next version of OS/X will load just fine on the Mini, too. It comes with Automator, which, if hooked up to GarageBand, would provide an automated way to refactor existing long-form podcasts into this new track model. Automator could also build consoles to automate real-time, radio-style production with multiple audio inputs, taking advantage of Tiger's enhanced ability to handle multiple virtual audio devices.

4. iWork and iLife

Keynote, Pages, and iMovie are morphing into a podcast-to-video porting environment. Use Automator consoles to load in podcast segments and annotate them with links, iPhoto transitions, and attention-influenced intelligent caching of related pod- and Mini-casts, and you're well on your way to a read/write version of the RSS-powered multimedia Web. While DRMForSure coddles the cartel, the iPod Platform plays to the customers in the seats.

XML based Universal Business Language

http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2004/05/14/UBL10

A morning in Africa

[via emergic.org]
Atanu Dey quotes a wonderful short poem with plenty to think about


It is morning in Africa and
As the sun rises over the plains
The gazelle awakens knowing that
If it cannot outrun the fastest lion
It will be dead.

It is morning in Africa and
The lion awakens knowing that
If it cannot outrun the slowest gazelle
It will die.

It is morning in Africa and you had better start running.

Intuitive Design

Source: Emergic.org

[via Amy Wohl] Jaerd Spoll asks: "What does it mean, from a design standpoint, when someone desires a design to be intuitive?"


In our research, we've discovered that there are two conditions where users will tell you an interface seems `intuitive' to them. It only takes meeting one of the two conditions to get the user to tell you the design is intuitive. When neither condition is met, the same user will likely complain that the interface feels "unintuitive".

Condition #1:
Both the current knowledge point and the target knowledge point are identical. When the user walks up to the design, they know everything they need to operate it and complete their objective.

Condition #2:
The current knowledge point and the target knowledge point are separate, but the user is completely unaware the design is helping them bridge the gap. The user is being trained, but in a way that seems natural.

The biggest challenge in making a design seem intuitive to users is learning where the current and target knowledge points are. What do users already know and what do they need to know? To build intuitive interfaces, answering these two questions is critical.

For identifying the user's current knowledge, we favor field studies. Watching potential users, in their own environments, working with their normal set of tools, and facing their daily challenges, gives us tremendous insight in what knowledge they will have and where the upper bounds are. Teams receive a wealth of valuable information with every site visit.

For identifying necessary target knowledge for important tasks, usability testing is a favorite technique of ours. When we sit users in front of a design, the knowledge gap becomes instantly visible.

Moreover Technologies Provides MSN With RSS Feed Search and Access Capability

RSS Search -- Unlike other RSS search tools that only search across information about the RSS feed, Moreover enables users to find relevant content by providing the capability to search against the full content of the originating posts.

Complete article at: http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/050202/sfw004_1.html


Interesting article

By Russ:

http://www.russellbeattie.com/notebook/1008231.html

Have you looked at your phone today

Russell Beattie presents a really interesting case: http://www.russellbeattie.com/notebook/1008243.html

By Russ:

This is a pretty simple question. Did you look at your phone today? In other words, did you use it for something else other than making phone calls? What did you do? Did you just look up a contact in order to make a phone call? Did you check the time? Did you get or send an SMS Message? Did you take a picture? Did you view a web site? Did you play a game?
I always make the distinction between "looking at" your phone verses simply saying "using" it because it helps define the area that I'm mostly concentrating on. There are voice services and VoIP opportunities out there, I just don't know much about them (except for the little that I've written about here). What I'm mostly interested in is what happens when people are looking at their phone. This is the core of the "Shibuya Epiphany" right? So it's an importnt distinction to make.
At the end of the day I ask myself these questions above. Lately I haven't been looking at my phone much and it makes me wonder why not. I can make excuses like I've been at my desk more and haven't needed to use my phone, or there hasn't been a specific mobile context which demanded the use of my phone. This may be true, but I don't need much of a context to use my computer do I? I can browse the web, check email (my primary uses lately), write, play games, use IM, or a whole host of other apps. I can and do spend hours on my computer without needing any sort of excuse or context to do it. Television is also like this. I can sit down at my TV and spend hours, and I don't need to be much more than "in the mood" to watch television. What makes this connected multimedia device in my pocket any different?
I've got what is arguably the most powerful mobile phone in the world in my pocket. It's a 3G device with a variety of communications and media capabilities, yet it sat there for the past 72 hours with nary a button press. In *my* pocket. Why? Obviously there are other devices and offline activities (sleep, mostly) which are competing for my loving attention. And honestly there's also really a dearth of apps and content for the phone - I've played with most of what's available already (but that hasn't stopped me with fiddling with all that stuff before). But I think what the real reason I haven't used my phone is this idea of context.
Mobile phones still need that killer app which takes out the need for context. They need to get to the point where they are less devices that you use while out and about, and considered more destinations in their own right. In other words, the current crop of apps are mostly created with that "mobile context" in mind. So you could say I haven't looked at my phone lately because I haven't been moving much. This is wrong. It's limiting a platform which can potentially do anything that a small computer with broadband access can do. The person who comes up with the app that compels a person to use their phone without considering the fact that it's a phone is going to have a killer app on their hand. One could argue the opposite, that mobile phone apps *should* only be used in the mobile context, but I think that's too narrow minded.
Anyways, these are my thoughts on a daily basis. If you're developing mobile products or services, you have to ask yourself the same questions if you go a few days without messing with your phone. Why? And what can I do to change that?


Content Aggregating.. Is it legal ?

http://www.russellbeattie.com/notebook/1008249.html

Content Aggregating.. Is it legal ?

By Russell Beattie:

Copyright law is very simple: You create something and its yours. It's not a trademark, or a patent, but a copyright. It's automatically given to you when you create something and if anyone wants to use your content for any reason, they need to ask you. Things like the Creative Commons license and the Gnu license *do not* supersede this basic right. You create something and its yours and you get to do what you want with it, but others need to ask. Period. I see developers all the time get confused about this - they wonder if they can change a license on their work after they've published it. It's *YOUR* copyright, you can do *whatever* you want with it. Licenses are for others.

So this guy is basically saying that all commercial aggregators are illegal, and I think he's right. That includes My Yahoo, BlogLines, MyWireService, etc. You can't take for granted the fact that the content is out there in an RSS format made for syndication. It doesn't matter. In reality it's no more or less formatted than these words are right now. If you want to republish or use someone else's copyrighted material, you have to get permission. Period. That's how it works, digitally packaged up or not. And it doesn't matter if the aggregator is free or not, if it is re-publishing the content (i.e. not from the original source) it's against copyright law.

And again a few months ago:
I can put ads on this site because it's all my content, but on a site with a bunch of external feeds - several of which are marked for Personal Use Only? That doesn't seem either right or legal. The whole idea, actually, of putting ads on other people's content just doesn't seem right. I'm not the only one. Anyone else besides me notice that neither Bloglines, Technorati or Feedster have advertisements? That's nice, but how are these sites going to make money? And how different is aggregating RSS feeds from what Google does (aggregating HTML pages)? I mean, they put ads on a summary of my pages, just like an RSS feed. They also have an archive of my site online as well, which is against my personal copyright of this site, but no one seems to mind just yet. There seems to be this craze for organizing and displaying all the info out there for profit - but I wonder if that's enough "added value" to justify charging for that service. I guess it is, as Technorati, Feedster and NewsGator have all gotten funding.

I wonder how long you can add value to a free service and charge someone money for it? I guess we bottle water, right?

Complete post @ http://www.russellbeattie.com/notebook/1008249.html

Solution to growing content..personalization, filtering

Some interesting thoughts by Russell Beattie:


Something dawned on me while reading that Gawker has launched a couple more weblogs including LifeHacker. It looked pretty interesting, so I signed up. In doing so, however, I started questioning the business model of these sorts of blogs. What happens when all the niches have been filled? And what happens when we're all using our aggregators for most of our online reading?
Then I started to think about the coming advertisements we're going to see in RSS feeds. There's already some sites out there doing it, and I assume it'll become more common soon. I started realizing some of the effort I put into some posts lately to drive traffic, but how for the most part I still use this blog for personal rants, etc.
What's happening is that online content is becoming a series of single serving content bits, sent around and filtered in a variety of ways. It's the same way that online music stores like iTunes have pushed singles back to the forefront again. Remember when you used to buy singles on records, and then it became a waste and you just bought the whole album? But now kids just buy the one song they like and don't waste money on the rest. Those that really like the song will explore the rest of that artists catalog, but for the majority, the one song is fine.
Weblog posts are like that as well, no? Back when I first started blogging, I modeled my blog software on Radio Userland's style. One page per day, with # anchors on the different posts of that day. Eventually as I continued to write, I decided that since my posts were generally longer, needed titles, and usually completely unrelated to anything else on that day, I switched to one post-one html page like Moveable Type, or WordPress. This works well for comments as well - that first post becomes the beginning of a discussion, and I don't have to worry whether my readers have weblogs or not to respond.
When the post goes out over RSS, however, it's completely devoid of all context. It's just my content in a self-contained post. Right now I imagine most people continue to read each post in sucession, as an easy way to keep up to date with a weblog they happen to like. However, as the number of RSS feeds increases, we're going to need filtering even on the blogs we've subscribed to! (Those information sources we've ostensibly filtered already by adding them to your aggregator). I've got 300+ weblogs in my aggregator (you can see them in my favorites page).

This is already becoming hard to manage, especially if I happen to skip a few days.
What's going to start happening is that I'll be looking to pick and choose the content via filters or searches or whatever new system we come up with tomorrow like tags. Desktop search for weblogs? The problem is that unlike the web search engines which point to individual websites that are able to monetize the traffic with banner and text-ads, a blog desktop search would be pointing at just your internal cache. That site may have a click-though to the original site in order to read the content, or, as is more common, the RSS feed has the entire content of the post and there's no reason to go back to the website. Thus you have the per-post RSS adverts.
But what are ads other than someone else paying for the content you get to read for free? Is that square inch of space on your aggregator worth something to you? Maybe we're entering the age of micropayments finally. They didn't make sense before, but now that we've all started to deal with online content not as "sites" to visit, but as "posts" to read, there's going to be pressure on the system like there is in the music world, to monetize the singles rather than the bundle.
Would you pay a third of a cent to read this article? I mean $0.003 doesn't seem like a whole lot of money, no? My posts get about 10,000 individual readers a day, which would bring me $30 a day. About the same as the $30 a day that Google AdSense is delivering me, except that my readers would be happier without ads... Now how this system would work and how to prevent it from being gamed, I don't know. But the thing I'm pointing out is the macro-view of online textual content following the similar route as music. I think it's an interesting observation (and probably one that's been made 1000 times before, but I just grokked it, so it's cool to me...)

And the coolest bit about this stuff? Singles and Posts fit *really* well on mobile phones. :-)

Tuesday, February 01, 2005

RSS/Blogs -- The best future marketing strategy

Found an article on the web:

Really Simple Syndication (RSS) is The Best Internet Marketing Strategy to Pursue in 2005, Say Tech Pundits VALLEY VILLAGE, Calif., Feb. 1 /PRNewswire/ -- As marketers are preparing their strategies for 2005, the Internet is taking center stage. According to eMarketer, web content syndication and corporate blogs are key internet marketing strategy developments for 2005 and the integration of RSS within MyYahoo has helped promote these technologies. The Pew Internet and the American Life project shows that blog readership jumped a full 58% in the last year with 32 million Americans now getting their news and information from blogs. Figures like these have prompted many businesses to start a corporate blog. The Blog Business Summit held in Seattle last week focused on the on the many benefits of corporate blogs. This increase in blogging and blog readership kick started a technology that has been around for some time -- syndication of content. Six million Americans now use newsreaders to get their news and other information delivered from blogs and content-rich websites as it is posted online. These are the early adopters marketers prize so highly -- veteran Internet users, who are well educated and spend time reading online. Although companies realize they have to embrace Internet marketing to reach their audiences today, many marketers don't fully understand this new technology. A new book by Rok Hrastnik, e-commerce Manager for Studio Moderna, the leading Central and Eastern European direct marketing company, and editor of Marketing Studies, explains it all in easy-to-understand English. "Unleash the Marketing and Publishing Power of Real Simple Syndication -- a marketers guide to understanding and taking advantage of RSS," goes through every question you might want to ask about web content strategy and syndication -- and then some. "RSS will become a critical tool for marketers, yet today most marketers still 'don't get' it," says Alex Barnett of Microsoft UK. "This guide is exactly what is needed to close this knowledge gap. It's the most comprehensive I've seen on using RSS as a marketing tool." "Understanding the importance of Internet content delivery is the key to unlocking your Internet business success," says Hrastnik. "Chances are more than half of your email subscribers aren't receiving or reading your messages anymore." Double Click, a company that delivers millions of email messages for its clients, reports that their average open rate is only 34.3% and the click through rate is 8.3%. "Your business suffers when you don't maximize your content delivery efforts," says Hrastnik. Blogging and syndicating your content can find new audiences, increase your readership, drive more traffic to your website, increase the response to your marketing messages and improve your search engine placement, says Sally Falkow, Internet Marketing Strategist at Expansion +. Falkow contributed the case studies on how blogs and RSS feeds affect search placement and online brand awareness. "Corporate blogs with news feeds are the most effective Internet marketing strategy right now," says Falkow. "One client went from zero page one results to over 100 in four months in the fiercely competitive Voice over IP market. As search marketing gets more and more competitive, and pay per click costs rise, blogging and news feeds will become a key marketing strategy." Savvy marketers will be reading "Unleash the Power of RSS" before they go into strategy meetings this month.